Map of Italy and Sicily showing major cities for the Allied invasion of Sicily in World War II

When Americans think of World War II in Europe, they usually picture Normandy hedgerows or the frozen forests of the Battle of the Bulge. Italy, where Allied armies fought for nearly two years and learned some of the hardest lessons of the war, often comes in as an afterthought.

Though long treated as a sideshow, the invasion of Sicily and the Italian Campaign shaped the course of the European war in decisive ways.

The Allied invasion of Sicily in July 1943, Operation Husky, was the first major assault on “Fortress Europe.” Measured by troops landed on the first day, it was larger than Normandy. It tested Allied readiness and exposed serious weaknesses that would later be corrected before D-Day.

The capture of Sicily opened Mediterranean shipping lanes and triggered political collapse inside Italy itself. Within weeks, Benito Mussolini was overthrown, and Italy would eventually switch sides and join the Allies.

Italy doesn’t fit neatly into the triumphant story Americans like to tell about World War II. Progress was agonizingly slow. Casualties were heavy. There were few dramatic breakthroughs. It became a grinding campaign measured in yards, not miles, with terrain fought over repeatedly, more reminiscent of World War I than World War II.

Winston Churchill famously called Italy the “soft underbelly” of Europe. It proved anything but.

From Salerno northward, German forces used Italy’s mountains, rivers, and weather as weapons. Soldiers fought in mud that swallowed vehicles, hauled supplies by mule, and endured winters that caused epidemics of trench foot. Rome was liberated in June 1944, but by then the world’s attention had shifted to Normandy, even as fighting in Italy dragged on.

Italy also remembers the war differently. Unlike France or Belgium, it has never built a large tourism industry around WWII memory. The war there was also a civil war between Fascists and Partisans which raises uncomfortable questions about collaboration and resistance. The result is quieter commemoration and fewer grand narratives.

To walk these landscapes today is to encounter a war that feels more raw and less resolved. It is a campaign worth remembering precisely because it resists simplification.